会计考友 发表于 2012-8-15 12:35:41

网络课堂总结(八)

Passage 16 damages in the accidental death of their two year old was told that since the child had made no real economic contribution*1A*2C to the family, there was no liability for damages. In contrast value on the market, that is(同位语), the conversion of their intangible worth into cash terms, became much greater.

1. It can be inferred from the passage that accidental-death damage awards in America during the nineteenth century*1 tended to be based principally on the
earnings*1A of the person at time of death
wealth of the party causing the death
degree of culpability of the party causing the death
amount of money that had been spent on the person killed(A)
amount of suffering endured by the family of the person killed

2. It can be inferred from the passage that in the early 1800’s*2(孩子价值还没转变) children were generally regarded by their families as individuals who
needed enormous amounts of security and affection
required constant supervision while working
were important to the economic well-being*2C of a family
were unsuited to spending long hours in school(C)
were financial burdens assumed for the good of society
页: [1]
查看完整版本: 网络课堂总结(八)