a我考网

 找回密码
 立即注册

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

查看: 72|回复: 0

[FECT高级考试] 金融法律辅导:法律英语导读(25)

[复制链接]
发表于 2012-8-16 08:34:12 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
  Empty Promises
, N1 d6 {$ A( @5 f9 G  Police officers' promises of leniency are usually empty. Police officers may recommend a light sentence, but at the end of the day it's prosecutors and judges who normally determine punishment on the basis of statutory requirements and political expediency.: K0 J; R6 q# M6 j! y) m$ [
  Case Example 1: Dee Nyal is arrested and charged with burglary. At the police station, Dee waives her Miranda rights and voluntarily tells the police that she is innocent, because she was at the movies at the time the burglary took place. At trial, the prosecutor wants to offer Dee's statement to the police into evidence to show it was false, because the movie Dee said she watched was not playing the night of the burglary. Dee protests that what she said to the police shouldn't be admissible because she didn't make a confession; instead she said she wasn't guilty.* u* B$ c) q9 [. p. _
  Question: Is Dee's statement to the police admissible in evidence?6 k: g8 `; l) b6 r( }* x3 w  z, H
  Answer: Yes. Dee waived her Miranda rights, so even though she was trying to help herself, the statement is admissible.2 J7 Z4 ]' W$ ^; n+ o% X; Q- x, O$ Y
  Case Example 2: Len Scap is arrested for murder. The police give Len his Miranda warning, then tell him that he might as well confess because the police found Len's fingerprints at the crime scene and because they have an eyewitness who can easily identify him. Feeling all is lost, Len confesses to the murder. It turns out that the police lied to Len—they had neither his fingerprints nor an eyewitness.
, ~0 I: D2 T3 s8 p3 j  Question: Is Len's confession admissible in evidence?
( s6 m2 A) O5 V  Answer: Very probably. Judges generally rule that confessions are voluntary even if they are obtained by the police through trickery. (See Frazier v. Cupp, U.S. Sup. Ct. 1969.); h% U$ C7 _$ h& F' V7 ~
  本节的题目翻译句子:3 Q0 N0 Y- f: k4 a) H3 e, q4 p9 n. S
  1、Police officers may recommend a light sentence, but at the end of the day it's prosecutors and judges who normally determine punishment on the basis of statutory requirements and political expediency.- _7 ~& R2 Z* S4 b+ }
  2、Judges generally rule that confessions are voluntary even if they are obtained by the police through trickery2 S' D# J( w0 K/ g1 H+ Z( m4 f7 _
  答案:
0 w* k3 t- |( C: r0 v0 j  1、警官可能会建议从轻判决,但最终还得由检察官和法官从法律和政治方面权衡作出判决。- U3 `# w7 p2 F
  2、法官通常会裁决,尽管证据是警官使诈所得,仍是嫌疑犯主动招供
回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则

Archiver|手机版|小黑屋|Woexam.Com ( 湘ICP备18023104号 )

GMT+8, 2024-6-17 06:37 , Processed in 0.164372 second(s), 21 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.4 Licensed

© 2001-2017 Comsenz Inc.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表