16. UPBRAlD : REPROACH ::
7 {% o- S5 N8 F6 w. p2 W
" H3 i+ y5 w0 v (A) dote : like
) d& g- X- r9 ^
3 V/ q9 m" {* v1 I (B) lal: : stray
& V5 t! O0 K8 L! _+ u/ G
7 b K# m: A. x$ y) v x0 C (C) vex : please 3 a3 K8 P+ z9 [/ p2 c* i
" g* x* B/ r8 I3 ]+ e
(D) earn : desire ( A" }0 E% Y" ^0 j, t$ u9 C$ D
1 |& I: B1 x' ~5 C
(E) recast : explain
$ z: f, d y% v. L 2 ^: P1 h! w& T& b; L3 @8 f) A
Directions: Each passage in this group is followed by questions based on its content.
0 y3 L% H0 C6 D$ P- b; c! z' C9 p/ g
# B! M' h# M* f4 s) e After reading a passage, choose the best answer to each question. Answer all questions
0 B0 A6 @' M3 m2 T
) S( H$ n) O8 Z3 U5 ?/ W following a passage on the basis of what is stated or implied in that passage. 2 @+ X' {5 k1 _6 c0 k/ ?& x+ d
9 ^, {- T* f0 u" t* a! I" { lt has been known for many decades that the appear- s2 s% w5 k' B& i4 I! O ~
* ^- I5 A$ G8 D- j3 ?4 C
ance of sunspots is roughly periodic, with an average
( P# e* u7 @' p. V {( r 5 _& A' s# T5 x, A* w
cycle of eleven years. Moreover, the incidence of solar
1 I1 [0 [' l1 _1 p( K8 L 7 p, u0 X+ q, D5 X8 Y& a9 m
flares and the flux of solar cosmic rays, ultraviolet radia-
' d& x5 s$ \( }
# w! j! A4 q; O P4 d tion, and x-radiation all vary directly with the sunspot (5) 3 n8 t* r: V5 }$ F8 i
5 v% Z( `5 H& `' N cycle. But after more than a century of investigation. the
8 a& J. ^! {* h 8 H+ h/ D: v+ N: _( {! K5 E
relation of these and other phenomena, known collec-
8 m" Z$ M7 e/ Z
+ a' G$ T! z+ r6 `3 F* x& N tively as the solar-activity cycle, to terrescrial weather , [. m0 Z* Y; G. R" L7 b# L
" G( {# v5 k" u# F/ ]( v and climate remains unclear. For example. the sunspot
: V9 j- h* f' E# y6 t7 f% ^7 N7 q . q$ V# ~, X+ s4 w
cycle and the allied rnagnetic-polarity cycle have been (10) 9 \# |% C& |" [4 m0 x, e4 P
. w3 g" v2 q; o1 n linked to periodicities discerned in records of such vari-
7 }8 U: J+ y3 h2 Q, P
0 `: U$ H* @0 b ables as rainhll. temperature, and winds. lnvariably, 8 N7 m7 R5 d" j: r% h
" G4 p( q8 Z7 m8 w0 ^ however, the relation is weak. and commonly ofdubious
, H( g% G/ q- t8 C, m( F. Q 5 i( W! H! z1 d* a: ]& j
statistical significance. , u2 B' C V( k2 `
( k3 \9 M `4 f1 K Effects of solar variability over longer terms have also (15) ! ?. i7 g- b' C$ U' P) ~- u2 i2 i
# H! ]( f6 I# K; Q$ k been sought. The absence of recorded sunspot activity in
3 m0 X/ V; j+ X5 R
$ P3 r3 [5 f1 I* o% c- D' _: |, Q the notes kept by European observers in the late seven-
* w0 ^$ l: M6 o7 d + I# n, Q( ^: r6 \6 K, n3 S. O
teenth and early eighteenth centuries has led some schol- 3 f Z" ~: l, C" @) _, s
# R& Y7 a! N* k2 k
ars to postulate a brief cessation of sunspot activity at 7 z9 d& _1 Y5 o% a! Q0 X6 c- [
4 K! K) F7 g" X4 ^2 `4 D$ Q
that time (a period called the Maunder minimum). The (20)
9 d. M8 X- M* b, k B! W5 Z; b
$ M) b& R/ b$ _5 V! A) H1 { Maunder minimum has been linked to a span of unusual + g6 D) v9 D1 V; j% z
/ {, m3 R4 Z' B cold in Europe extending from the sixteenth to the early
2 x; p9 [7 j+ B3 x* K$ Z" X
7 N' ^' q3 q" C' p8 M& G" C7 u nineteenth centuries. The reality of the Maunder mini-
2 z9 c- |" b; }0 h* y/ J2 W
0 I0 |% U- } t5 @9 l mum has yet to be established, however, especially since # y& L4 o2 A' I2 l1 O' P2 k# e
K. U4 ^& t7 L" G, H$ o the records that Chinese naked-eye observers of solar (25) 6 i5 a# q5 Q2 B& S$ V1 ]
8 x" C0 I6 G7 i+ w4 [4 J activity made at that time appear to contradict it. Scien-
* ?' @+ b' ~' m( X% ]2 n! p. x
" c5 h" f) D0 B. I4 D9 t* p tists have also sought evidence of long-term solar period-
! g, w" A3 E+ z4 u 1 `' f; O9 P6 Z5 u1 P) |
icities by examining indirect climatological data, such as
; g; P# [7 ]+ [3 a) a 2 {& l0 o5 g) `! v8 A5 o
fossil recoras of the thickness of ancient tree rings. These |