3. Superficial differences between the special </p> problems and techniques of the physical sciences ) @/ C7 s! U e, s
and those of the biological sciences are some-
/ x& t/ N) |' E' g$ Atimes cited as evidence for the ---- of biology
* H& |- W \8 j, L* `/ z; t$ Gand for the claim that the methods of physics
2 S& B! w0 i- K6 ]are therefore not adequate to biological inquiry.
, f6 B* V1 K, i1 F (A) autonomy
8 m8 P- j/ z( |9 w* v, D" L1 s/ \- A (B) vitalism
! E% N. F4 }* J9 I# \( \ (C) purposiveness
i+ F( F7 P! o" J! N( F (D) obsolescence
' Y4 }. S( S. A. P9 y (E) irrelevance
9 k/ n: }9 K% d0 q/ e0 J 4. As the creation of new knowledge through - `' N& q5 s6 ?8 ]5 r
science has become ---- resistance to innova-# h) w p. W$ g* M( \7 v2 S% j3 ~
tion has become less ---- taking the form of
# _# C }, K9 g( j5 s' ?8 p1 \inertia rather than direct attack." w" m" O4 ?1 g8 y# h. M+ Y
(A) controversial .. sporadic
- y3 E& A/ D) c+ ] (B) institutionalized .. aggressive0 k" h+ V0 G: G
(C) essential .. effective
6 Q! S2 f% }8 z4 W9 q3 U5 ?; b) m (D) public .. circumspect + c4 ]& G+ a) a8 a9 x% E1 w+ I
(E) suspect .. lively 8 e/ E3 o7 I& `+ r
5. Lizzie was a brave woman who could dare to
- C' j/ {3 a# }+ s( ]9 o incur a great danger for an adequate ----.
; E. d) p/ |' `8 a" M- @- ` (A) risk # {! S' |( h4 i
(B) combat
" g9 ]3 B3 b% _" y5 G0 S (C) object . h3 P% C6 W2 k3 D1 Y
(D) event . N) C g' ]$ o) Q |
(E) encounter 6 [- h; \/ I1 b, o" ~! s/ _
1.E 2.C 3.A 4.B 5.C |