8. Based upon a survey among workers that indicates a high level of interest in the # W, i5 M+ n; L% u
topics of corporate restructuring and redesign of benefits programs, the author
& S1 k3 d+ g4 ~) [concludes that workers are not apathetic about management issues. Specifically, it is 4 d* _" r4 T: h& T$ t" ~/ O* r+ {
argued that since 79 percent of the 1200 workers who responded to survey expressed
) b2 }: ]& Y% ]" Yinterest in these topics, the notion that workers are apathetic about management issues is " t# K z# G$ |+ N1 D! h; Q
incorrect. The reasoning in this argument is problematic in several respects.) f4 P' z/ n6 x# G7 f m
First, the statistics cited in the editorial may be misleading because the total 2 b6 ^% p% R1 n, ?% A9 a& S
number of workers employed by the corporation is not specified. For example, if the
0 N! M5 e8 \0 v4 f Gcorporation employs 2000 workers, the fact that 79 percent of the nearly 1200
' P. q- I* O* ?' Q' Z/ m2 ~respondents showed interest in these topics provides strong support for the conclusion.
7 _+ E& W( t% j QOn the other hand, if the corporation employs 200,000 workers, the conclusion is much ' `# K+ y r9 w( s9 C
weaker.
; b( H; ^. D& Y0 r1 L, f Another problem with the argument is that the respondents' views are not
$ ~2 O* `7 X# u$ K+ t# Knecessarily representative of the views of the work force in general. For example,
: Z5 K7 p1 [5 m8 `) b! o/ Gbecause the survey has to do with apathy, it makes sense that only less apathetic workers " g" {/ a1 z6 d3 @& \% p
would respond to it, thereby distorting the overall picture of apathy among the work 3 T1 _ n: ~7 e/ p1 i
force. Without knowing how the survey was conducted, it is impossible to assess
% C% L& a! |6 S( t& Kwhether or not this is the case.; l, ~" ~ k4 t# q$ u% A
A third problem with the argument is that it makes a hasty generalization about # ~1 `# a1 E1 {$ q0 Z
the types of issues workers are interested in. It accords with common sense that workers & O" t( R2 z. o2 C4 p3 U
would be interested in corporate restructuring and redesign of benefits programs, since
6 |$ n1 f4 k; N" Kthese issues affect workers very directly. However, it is unfair to assume that workers
9 g" J/ z$ _. X: y1 O" d7 a: awould be similarly interested in other management issues ones that do not affect them or : J' v L/ W2 Y3 G" L. |7 c
affect them less directly.: ~; y0 [: [3 p M7 }
In conclusion, this argument is not convincing as it stands. To strengthen it, the
1 d4 p! } N2 E; ~- }author would have to show that the respondents account for a significant and + s l/ W: H$ p
representative portion of all workers. Additionally, the author must provide evidence of ! ]. q" w4 I' u
workers' interest other management topics not just those that affect workers directly. |