GMAT考试写作指导：Argument范文八二

会计考友

8.  Based upon a survey among workers that indicates a high level of interest in the
6 r) n" G$ ~5 q/ W( G2 etopics of corporate restructuring and redesign of benefits programs, the author
7 M' a, S7 X- U* Y9 U- ]0 b$ n/ xconcludes that workers are not apathetic about management issues. Specifically, it is
) ~) e: a2 v9 f9 j3 M6 z  Fargued that since 79 percent of the 1200 workers who responded to survey expressed
interest in these topics, the notion that workers are apathetic about management issues is
9 ~4 ^/ D3 }! o( Z$ l' m5 k% a. H  Vincorrect. The reasoning in this argument is problematic in several respects.
      First, the statistics cited in the editorial may be misleading because the total
" S8 \& k! `: W. S+ \& [  Lnumber of workers employed by the corporation is not specified. For example, if the
corporation employs 2000 workers, the fact that 79 percent of the nearly 1200
respondents showed interest in these topics provides strong support for the conclusion.
) M3 W1 s6 R, w2 eOn the other hand, if the corporation employs 200,000 workers, the conclusion is much
weaker.
/ m. ~1 P3 z4 a      Another problem with the argument is that the respondents' views are not
% f; |. p$ S; S# E) }" h+ Snecessarily representative of the views of the work force in general. For example,
& Y) y3 q7 B' H# a6 Obecause the survey has to do with apathy, it makes sense that only less apathetic workers
would respond to it, thereby distorting the overall picture of apathy among the work
force. Without knowing how the survey was conducted, it is impossible to assess
& t' |0 X3 E& N" u! k+ F9 j" E' S- ~whether or not this is the case.
      A third problem with the argument is that it makes a hasty generalization about
7 V1 E7 ~% U9 X. _7 Gthe types of issues workers are interested in. It accords with common sense that workers
would be interested in corporate restructuring and redesign of benefits programs, since
: t1 l" [; L$ ?, L" z6 s( b9 Vthese issues affect workers very directly. However, it is unfair to assume that workers
! c+ w- R  L/ w" Ywould be similarly interested in other management issues ones that do not affect them or
affect them less directly.
      In conclusion, this argument is not convincing as it stands. To strengthen it, the
, u& h9 t$ P, R/ ~$ b' H" xauthor would have to show that the respondents account for a significant and
representative portion of all workers. Additionally, the author must provide evidence of
/ l+ e4 \$ w9 aworkers' interest other management topics not just those that affect workers directly.