a我考网

 找回密码
 立即注册

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

查看: 76|回复: 0

[FECT高级考试] 金融法律辅导:法律英语导读(14)

[复制链接]
发表于 2012-8-16 08:34:12 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
  A Police Officer Wants to Talk to Me About a Crime That I Took Part in. Is It Ever a Good Idea to Try to Talk My Way out of It?# `  z- r8 L, o1 D
  Usually, no. The Golden Rule of Defense is that suspects who think that they may be implicated(牵连) in a crime should keep their mouths tightly shut. Suspects all too frequently unwittingly reveal information that later can be used as evidence of guilt. The right to not incriminate oneself guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution is especially powerful in this situation, and a suspect should politely decline to answer questions, at least until consulting with an attorney.
4 {8 ^6 y1 l0 q! T& q! D5 G  12. A Police Officer Wants to Ask me About a Crime That a Friend or Relative of Mine Committed. What Do I Risk by Providing False Information?! f; t2 O1 M& \4 \
  A lot. When an individual lies to the police or otherwise intentionally assists a known criminal to avoid arrest, he or she may be charged as an "accessory after the fact(事后从犯)." Obviously, the decision as to whether to furnish information leading to the arrest of a relative or close friend is a personal one. However, a person who chooses not to do so should simply decline to answer an officer's questions rather than lie. Rarely, if ever, would an individual who simply declines to give information to a police officer qualify as an "accessory after the fact."
# f5 B5 }3 u5 g4 v  T6 v& q3 I  Case Example: Cain comes running into his brother Abel's house, and tells Abel that he, Cain, just robbed a market and that the police might be on his tail. A few minutes later, a police officer knocks on Abel's door and asks him if Cain is in the house. Abel responds, "No, he left town permanently to go back east weeks ago."
# @: _7 D' X+ T! D% G4 v  Question: Is Abel subject to criminal prosecution?
9 x* M3 b0 N* \0 W$ s, g/ a  本节题目:  s/ @7 l0 ]9 Y! W- _
  1、Rarely, if ever, would an individual who simply declines to give information to a police officer qualify as an "accessory after the fact."
! W$ r! L, O- c3 P4 v. N% u" ?  2、Question: Is Abel subject to criminal prosecution?
8 J; W  M7 w+ F% q4 z" Y, H  答案:
3 T. ^3 d$ y, f* P8 N1 f  1、一个人只是拒绝为警官提供情报,不构成事后从犯,即使存在也很罕见。
9 Q1 l  l& ~. g& T" C( I  2、YES
回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则

Archiver|手机版|小黑屋|Woexam.Com ( 湘ICP备18023104号 )

GMT+8, 2024-7-6 05:55 , Processed in 0.803641 second(s), 21 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.4 Licensed

© 2001-2017 Comsenz Inc.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表