a我考网

 找回密码
 立即注册

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

查看: 47|回复: 0

[六级阅读] 2011年12月英语六级阅读理解题冲刺精选七

[复制链接]
发表于 2012-8-14 10:30:44 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
Conventional wisdom about conflict seems pretty much cut and dried. Too little conflict breeds apathy (冷漠) and stagnation (呆滞). Too much conflict leads to divisiveness (分裂) and hostility. Moderate levels of conflict, however, can spark creativity and motivate people in a healthy and competitive way.   Recent research by Professor Charles R. Schwenk, however, suggests that the optimal level of conflict may be more complex to determine than these simple generalizations. He studied perceptions of conflict among a sample of executives. Some of the executives worked for profit-seeking organizations and others for not-for-profit organizations.( K1 F# Z! h5 [
  Somewhat surprisingly, Schwenk found that opinions about conflict varied systematically as a function of the type of organization. Specifically, managers in not-for-profit organizations strongly believed that conflict was beneficial to their organizations and that it promoted higher quality decision making than might be achieved in the absence of conflict.* N4 u6 j' M, N2 x* {* y/ X: ]
  Managers of for-profit organizations saw a different picture. They believed that conflict generally was damaging and usually led to poor-quality decision making in their organizations. Schwenk interpreted these results in terms of the criteria for effective decision making suggested by the executives. In the profit-seeking organizations, decision-making effectiveness was most often assessed in financial terms. The executives believed that consensus rather than conflict enhanced financial indicators.% x+ D) h8 b+ p  K7 n  k2 |
  In the not-for-profit organizations, decision-making effectiveness was defined from the perspective of satisfying constituents. Given the complexities and ambiguities associated with satisfying many diverse constituents executives perceived that conflict led to more considered and acceptable decisions.
& P; D8 S- b3 T6 M# `( P
% j' ~/ W1 W" B$ b$ N! I- e5 Z! z36. We learn from the passage that olestra is a substance that_______.   A) contains plenty of nutrients
$ o5 F+ ?7 l& J# \( H2 ]1 b  B) renders foods calorie-free while retaining their vitamins
* O7 l1 L& t  A8 L& l. d  C) makes foods easily digestible
) F7 q7 Z# B( I0 R2 Z, s  D) makes foods fat-free while keeping them delicious
+ S2 F3 _; g  c/ q! |1 Q8 S. x! o  37.The result of the search for an easily digestible fat turned out to be_______.3 U( i% R. \+ t/ `" w
  A) commercially useless0 s1 K$ U) L5 M) y8 y8 s! d6 y
  B) just as anticipated
" G/ ?$ d6 j. N: B# u3 g/ w) M  C) somewhat controversial
$ `9 P+ V6 @8 u4 I3 s  D) quite unexpected
2 L' j! e( `1 E5 X  38.Olestra is different from ordinary fats in that_______.% \6 D8 a* o5 ]
  A) it passes through the intestines without being absorbed+ R5 w- ^) f% N, j/ U
  B) it facilitates the absorption of vitamins by the body+ m: O7 r& T, o; S( @
  C) it helps reduce the incidence of heart disease* X6 ?' I5 @: _6 X& f
  D) it prevents excessive intake of vitamins3 _' N! R1 _. O7 [/ s( C
  39.What is a possible negative effect of olesira according to some critics?3 j0 y; ?, J; q- [6 @( f
  A) It may impair the digestive system.$ C6 t+ ^8 x& |$ g2 @4 r$ x
  B) It may affect the overall fat intake.; m' ^- x  b9 Y. U! Y. a" p
  C) It may increase the risk of cancer.
, @; a* P" y1 z' n& W" y# }  D) It may spoil the consumers' appetite.  d% l) \( q0 v7 }6 U: E& l
  40.Why are nutritionists concerned about adding vitamins to olesira?1 y2 z' z0 X; m) E' \
  A) It may lead to the over-consumption of vitamins.
/ c6 E1 A# `6 d0 x) `' [$ \  B) People may be induced to eat more than is necessary.* A8 b1 }9 K+ f. }" d* V
  C) The function of the intestines may be weakened. 跨段0 A) n- j2 f1 w8 o
  D) It may trigger a new wave of fake food production.
回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则

Archiver|手机版|小黑屋|Woexam.Com ( 湘ICP备18023104号 )

GMT+8, 2024-5-29 10:54 , Processed in 0.399953 second(s), 21 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.4 Licensed

© 2001-2017 Comsenz Inc.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表