综合训练, L$ s, S% _ O3 x' m3 ^) G
Last year's economy should have won the Oscar for the best picture.
5 n5 N8 F: n8 K3 R- Ygrowth in gross domestic product was 4.1 percents; profits soared; exports ___1___
% b4 ^; @/ G) N" W0 ~' a& Gflourished; and inflation stayed around 3 percent for the third year. Though ___2___
; J) y- L9 [8 f! \. mwhy so many Americans give the picture a lousy B rating? The answer is
! J2 x! z! y4 o/ H5 u5 I7 X: ajobs. The microeconomic situation was good, and the microeconomic ___3___" |" e4 Y; ?# i5 z8 E: {
numbers were not. Yes, 3 million new jobs were there, but not enough of them
9 o, d# i* a7 q/ F( fwere temporary, good jobs paying enough to support a family. Job ___4___
- g: g* m1 V7 k. a6 L! _7 o3 Ginsecurity was rampant(猖獗的). Even as they announced higher sales and
1 H2 j0 u. j. Yprofits, corporations acted as if they were in a tailspin, cutting 516,069 jobs# C* t5 q. C& {0 F) h0 W) m
in 1994 alone, almost as much as in the recession year of 1991. ___5___
9 R! D9 b3 e NYes, unemployment went down. But over 1 million workers were so* B2 f/ S! V& B% s" [! `. R
couraged that they left the labor force. More than 6 million who wanted ___6___
; G! `+ S" S. G. W* V6 W1 y. c- i. |fulltime job were only partially employed; and another large group was either
" x0 { Z3 I' |+ E. e+ F4 _9 qunqualified or sheltered behind the euphemism of self-employment. We lost2 t B) I* y/ y9 k; {
a million good manufacturing jobs between 1990 and 1995, continuing the
& I) X ]7 ^$ E5 y0 ltrend the blue-collar work force has been reduced from about 30 percent in ___7___4 F2 ~2 Z% e& d# q5 C$ a* C n
the 1950s to about half that today. White-collar workers found out they are ___8___
) ?9 J! E. T- H. R+ x: ino longer immue. For the first time, they were let go in numbers virtually7 r# I, o% r0 r3 H
equal to those for blue-collar workers. Many resorted in temporary work ___9___
, e/ H9 a, m, J; l' |5 Fwith lower pay, fewer benefits but less status. ___10___1 I8 r- a/ i ?. F" I) i- r
All that in a country where people meet for the first time would say ,
5 F; h0 i# e7 q( Y1 q1 N- E3 L“what do you do?”
% Q7 _+ H0 P. e& l6 M; h) H3 G+ Y: B
" _* Z& c) ]4 `# Z' l% M. ]参考答案及解析:
$ t: z! ^" Z& u' ?6 V D1. percents -> percent' c- k# ~8 ~/ P
用percent表示百分数时,只需用基数词加上单数percent即可。
& k* `! A5 V! q# D9 q
" q+ c. a; U! b$ E/ [& n2. Though -> But
8 v9 ~( Q" e0 r |; {! ^, D8 M3 u% m' x! g2 [* \
3. and -> but9 Y! a! S1 n! {" O1 Z8 L. O- Z- W
4. temporary -> permanent9 W0 y! n) Y& a& |6 l
根据句意:尽管有300万个新的工作职位,但长久的工作岗位是不足够的。temporary意为“临时的,暂时的”,permanent意为“永久的,固定的”,根据but和not enough可知应该是没有足够的长久工作岗位。
/ `6 W# z, s. p6 {5. much -> many" ] R# z+ `0 K' l0 l0 W- {
此处的many修饰前面的jobs,相当于almost as many (jobs) as in the recession year of 1991。由于job是可数名词,故应该用many修饰。2 m+ C; E( e' i: Z& V3 r
6. couraged -> discouraged3 K: c9 x0 j, d" [
根据上下文,短期的工作使工人失望,所以应该使用discouraged。
/ X' c/ @ A& t1 S, q, o0 @* W" I2 J7. trend后加that- I3 ~" @9 d- d* e/ Y: S
此处trend后是一个完整的句子,根据意思这句话是解释说明trend的同位语从句,故要加上引导词that。注:同位语从句的that不能省略。4 c: S4 G0 q$ Z7 k1 ~
8. are -> were
2 h" L6 r1 K: M, Z2 c; Y! b根据整篇文章的时态和主句的谓语动词found out可知此处要用过去时。5 O/ I% P' U: m- z2 a+ i
9 V7 b }& f1 ^0 p# G' b. |, l9. in -> to6 `) H) y1 Q' X* G. {6 R) e
eesort to是固定搭配,意为“求助于….,采取”。
: u7 ^, Y# k/ B' v* |: d3 n10. but -> and
, O: w- |; {2 W' `+ J此句句意为“很多人都会做工资少、福利少和低职位的临时工”。 此处lower pay, fewer benefits 和less status都属于同级,因此应该是并列关系而不是转折关系。 |