A number of colleges and universities have announced steep
$ z; b1 m6 B# R6 j: v tuition increases for next year much steeper than the current,4 {* k8 k0 n, K
very low rate of inflation. They say the increases are needed because* L0 {; ?" S, D
of a loss in value of university endowments' heavily investing in common __1__
+ w$ I( v+ S' j7 A: }' x% l stock. I am skeptical. A business firm chooses the price that maximizes* A: j9 h& N/ Z: [
its net revenues, irrespective fluctuations in income; and increasingly the __2__/ q, j/ B! ]+ q; D
outlook of universities in the United States is indistinguishable from those of __3__5 K5 z6 a! K3 i# ?
business firms. The rise in tuitions may reflect the fact economic uncertainty __4__
! }# d, n! \- n5 u A( B increases the demand for education. The biggest cost of being
1 Y* d/ a. n0 E6 b/ O in the school is foregoing income from a job (this is primarily a factor in __5__
: m5 ^' ?1 p# V8 J; V0 M graduate and professional-school tuition); the poor one' s job prospects, __6__
0 P4 @# k# e: {& n the more sense it makes to reallocate time from the job market to education,/ Q3 w4 F# N- h( P% t' p# M0 r
in order to make oneself more marketable.
+ M# W5 l1 L3 F V2 E" X The ways which universities make themselves attractive to students __7__' f- {1 [1 T4 z2 ^1 ~
include soft majors, student evaluations of teachers, giving students/ f4 ?/ }8 A1 P% ^$ Y4 a
a governance role, and eliminate required courses. __8__
9 Z: W( R# h8 C3 e Sky-high tuitions have caused universities to regard their students as
Q3 U0 w2 z0 F2 N/ B* A( | customers. Just as business firms sometimes collude to shorten the __9__' E7 a& B+ p/ |8 B- f
rigors of competition, universities collude to minimize the cost to them of the
+ F3 i) o+ n5 N( R) c athletes whom they recruit in order to stimulate alumni donations, so the best
9 E2 q* c- S; g athletes now often bypass higher education in order to obtain salaries earlier
! B# u7 A2 |* f& C from professional teams. And until they were stopped by the antitrust authorities,
5 d5 C8 r( T5 |, U7 q the Ivy League schools colluded to limit competition for the best students, by: b: J) q. W( _8 w$ Q; c6 d! t6 x
agreeing not to award scholarships on the basis of merit rather than purely
* d3 w; F; d8 I8 G% l. b of need-just like business firms agreeing not to give discounts on their best __10__9 K! d2 G3 c) m
customer.
/ ?' g; \8 A. ]# f' @! [ 答案及解析:
D ?- |( a8 i; N* Z" ? 1. investing应改为invested。
( Q, F, Y! ~# o8 W, P" g0 ` 这里说“投资于”普通股中的捐赠金价值损失惨重,既然是投资,就是指人去投资,即endowments (that were)heavily invested in.括号内的部分是被省略的部分,本句形式上是主动,实际意义上为被动,因此应该把investing改为invested,否则逻辑上和语法上都是说不通的。; t+ K9 m" i$ r. c3 ?
2. 在irrespective和fluctuations之间加上介词of。irrespectiveOf是一固定用法,意指“不论,不管,不顾,”等,如:irrespectiveOfthecost不惜工本,irrespective of the consequences不顾后果,irrespective of duty status不论职位高低。此处指公司不顾收入的波动变化。
/ e+ _2 s4 R5 _, c7 u 3. 把those改为that。本句的后半部分主要强调的是大学里的“看法或观点”(outlook)与企业公司的看法或观点不一样,即着眼点在于对两种% T6 z6 I& i- _0 f
不同团体看法的对比。既然前面用的是单数形式,后面也应用单数形式,基本语法规则是前后应一致,本句为代词those的误用,所以应把' O, r9 D/ }8 h+ r0 y
those改为that。
$ L' L- g3 ~! K" C, Q 4.在fact和economic之间力口上关系代词that。这是一个同位语从语,that在同位语从句中是不能省略的,否则就很可能出现意思所指不清的. O! @" ]) e3 C! g8 Q/ x
麻烦,所以此处必须加上关系代词that。& b6 ~$ B b: I6 U( e' Y* j
5.把定冠词the去掉。定冠词与一名词连用,表示某个或某些特定的人或物或机构等,而此处的in the school,一则意思不清,二则可能指在某人正在某个具体学校做某事。这一层意思与本文上下文不相吻合。比较之下,inschool是一固定说法,表示“在上学或求学”、“在校读书”正符合本文上下文的意思。因此应把定冠词去掉。. y3 X- N" ]8 i" v+ Y" S1 C
6.把形容词poor改为其比较级poorer。这句中的poor与后面的more形成一对比较关系,表示“越……越……”,根据这一思路,我们应把形容词poor改为其比较级poorer,以表达一种对称关系。( r: k# T1 \* w" ^! ?# N
7.在ways和which之间加上一个介词in。在ways和which之间加上一个介词in,表示in these ways,即指通过前面提到的这些方法。相似的句子较多,如:Not all sounds made by animals serve as language,and we have only to turn to that extra ordinary discovery of echo-location in bats to see a case in which the voice plays a strictly utilitarian role.(动物发出的声音并不是都能当作语言,因此我们只好求助于蝙蝠回声定位的这种非凡的发展,探究一下语音在何种情况下起着绝对有用的作用。)
/ ~8 N( F, d# L4 [& }6 ` 8.这里应该用动词的—lng形式,即eliminating,以便使句型结构与前面的giving(students a governance role)保持一致,否则句子结构和意思都显得不正确。2 C# i9 F3 B( m( r& C3 g& `, L N! m
9.将shorten(缩短;使变短)改为reduce或weaken。此处属于用词不当。应将shorten(缩短;使变短)改为reduce(使精神垮下来;使身体弱)或weaken(使削弱;使衰减),可表示文中所表示的“减弱竞争的残酷性”。 |