Questions 1-10* I8 X# H. x0 I- l: r* k$ e5 A6 d
By far the most important United States export product in the eighteenth and; i) [; y$ ^1 s0 h! E! h: p% [1 U' _
nineteenth centuries was cotton, favored by the European textile industry over flax or
& D0 B! C, ]" H9 i% zwool because it was easy to process and soft to tile touch. Mechanization of spinning7 q) ^' s# P9 t1 E9 y
Line and weaving allowed significant centralization and expansion in the textile industry during
1 Y% @6 S' o2 v% m. \! H(5) this period, and at the same time the demand for cotton increased dramatically. American$ u6 c4 w7 s( ~3 o, \* r
producers were able to meet this demand largely because of tile invention of the cotton gin( @3 t7 }5 ?' @. X
by Eli Whitney in 1793. Cotton could be grown throughout the South, but separating the
' y/ y% c V( ?$ Z# efiber---or lint--from the seed was a laborious process. Sea island cotton was relatively( O4 m$ v X6 t* m3 w8 W/ H
easy to process by hand, because its fibers were long and seeds were concentrated at the6 p, s, r, \" S) e8 }
(10) base of the flower, but it demanded a long growing season, available only along the
0 K" e" {# y4 P3 Z' f" v' `) }nation's eastern seacoast. Short-staple cotton required a much shorter growing season," P- m; |( v8 u, B2 ~' c
but the shortness of the fibers and their mixture with seeds meant that a worker could4 H1 O: k* a# r; Q7 K3 {
hand-process only about one pound per day. Whitney's gin was a hand-powered machine
* _& H% }* X2 wwith revolving drums and metal teeth to pull cotton fibers away from seeds. Using the gin," s$ ]& L) p8 L( Z
(15) a worker could produce up to '50 pounds of lint a day. The later development of larger
( z$ p) x3 d2 e. w5 _* C; C( ngins, powered by horses, water, or steam, multiplied productivity further." q* ?: G, ]& j" o9 g; ?3 |$ J
The interaction of improved processing and high demand led to the rapid spread of0 ~: R3 O8 x3 c" c
the cultivation of cotton and to a surge in production. It became the main American R9 f% ~; p. q, q3 T6 E2 T' a
export, dwarfing all others. In 1802, cotton composed 14 percent of total American+ D6 \% j( @# x/ J5 Y A7 f
(20))exports by value. Cotton had a 36 percent share by 1810 and over a 50 percent share7 e& F4 V% j+ J* V# l( J0 ]6 v e; `1 q
in 1830. In 1860, 61 percent of the value of American exports was represented by cotton.
3 A8 T" y- ]2 d% ?) g" xIn contrast, wheat and wheat flour composed only 6 percent of the value of American
( i. ^# v& O1 Vexports in that year. Clearly, cotton was king in the trade of the young republic. The: i" L% o, B/ |; V! a# ?5 l
growing market for cotton and other American agricultural products led to an
6 C6 _6 d* n) @" ^- I3 a(25) unprecedented expansion of agricultural settlement, mostly in the eastern half of the
5 X! P% H. E" |2 K. i% g4 fUnited States---west of the Appalachian Mountains and east of the Mississippi River. |