WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Barack Obama on Tuesday laid out what he called a battle plan to tackle the BP oil spill and exhorted Americans in warlike terms to embark on a mission to reduce their reliance on fossil fuels. 9 o7 f9 S, q; O2 y
The president used the solemn setting of the Oval Office for a televised address to counter criticism he has not shown enough leadership in America's worst environmental crisis but offered few specifics on how he intended to get the job done.
8 T% a# X! N" K" m% _( h7 W - q3 o! w" q* F$ G
Obama vowed that BP Plc would pay the price for its "recklessness" in the Gulf of Mexico oil spill and sought to harness public outrage over the disaster to build momentum for his goals of a "greener" energy future.: J- F" \0 V$ B' R/ h* B# K' I
7 X* u# H& ?+ x2 J D. Y "We will fight this spill with everything we've got for as long as it takes. We will make BP pay for the damage their company has caused," Obama said in a speech aimed at restoring confidence in his handling of the crisis before it further tarnishes his presidency.
3 n- U, N$ o3 y. w f 5 b u7 Q+ @1 k
Obama's stern message for BP was a centerpiece of his high-stakes speech on the oil spill, which threatens to distract from his domestic agenda of reducing nearly double-digit U.S. unemployment and reforming Wall Street.8 _ u0 O+ Q) S# _( B: I
/ r' l/ l, a7 l0 t4 H
How forcefully Obama responds to America's worst ecological disaster will have implications not only for the British energy giant but also for the future of U.S. offshore drilling and any hopes he has of reviving climate change legislation stalled in Congress.
: [1 O2 q; ^! ^4 z* w" P% [7 J. X
, J9 v: Q( i+ C% Q Adding a fresh sense of urgency, a team of U.S. scientists on Tuesday raised their high-end estimate of the amount of crude oil flowing from the well by 50 percent, to a range of 35,000 to 60,000 barrels (1.47 million to 2.52 million gallons/5.57 million to 9.54 million liters) per day.$ W9 ~) s6 T4 l, j- z- j
4 p" y( H$ a3 c/ M/ t- ]
Obama spoke in a measured tone devoid of anger as he assured Americans the stricken Gulf region would recover. He predicted containment efforts should succeed in capturing up to 90 percent of the oil gushing from the well in coming weeks.& _9 ~) r/ `) `, [
) `( {$ k5 \0 @) `+ k- [ Obama also sought to rally them by casting his effort in the language of war. He described the onslaught of oil as a "siege" and warned the public to gird itself for the long haul. "Tonight I'd like to lay out for you what our battle plan is going forward," Obama said.& X: |& Y1 m; j/ a9 ~
' w- o4 f7 Q& W- {1 z# A* {9 D While urging Americans to "seize the moment" to break their addiction to fossil fuels, he spoke in mostly vague terms, offering no detailed prescription or timetable for passing comprehensive energy legislation.! b/ o1 ?5 c- s$ u" i: `
( p2 r$ P5 E* I) ? "Now is the moment for this generation to embark on a national mission to unleash American innovation and seize control of our own destiny," he said.3 y/ b( F- v( A: S2 k$ d
0 \( Y( f( }+ _; r' q, p( s4 J
Obama has made clear he supports a comprehensive energy bill that would reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and a senior administration official said the president still believed that putting a price on carbon pollution was essential.
/ O3 q9 u* D' Q! H' T* d7 R0 [) E - K8 h2 J) |- _3 y/ L
But he stopped short of talking specifically about the climate change component in his speech, perhaps mindful of the political obstacles during a stuttering economic recovery.
+ J8 u/ B/ @7 X5 v1 t- [ 5 Z6 D/ @: @, n3 O# v
"Basically, a non-event here. It was really backwards looking. When he talked about alternative energy, he talked about what he already did -- and not what he needed to do. I don't think it's going to do too much for the alternative energy sector tomorrow, that's for sure," said Ben Pang, an analyst at Caris & Company in San Francisco.# n9 q4 H3 r# L- N, K
( z& \( D3 ]5 |2 I: x! J" B Obama's choice of the Oval Office setting underscored the gravity of the situation. Presidents in the past have used it to respond to national tragedies, as Ronald Reagan did after the 1986 explosion of the space shuttle Challenger and George W. Bush after the attacks of September 11, 2001./ ~- J! `2 H( h i* r. C T
# T; F: o7 x9 d/ T
ELECTION YEAR4 f, P8 y4 Z6 ?% v2 H0 E0 B
5 Q+ f, g J' \
Another crucial question is whether Obama can placate angry voters in a congressional election year when his Democratic party's grip on legislative power is at risk.$ q% S# P; U1 y6 S1 M# u+ f
* o' }, e3 L& ~+ Y Opinion polls show most Americans believe Obama has been too detached in dealing with the crisis and has not been tough enough in dealing with BP.
! d7 q1 G% I8 P# X : D1 s( c+ t( `# q2 q1 |0 G. `7 X
0 _7 E2 l7 _3 d a2 ~6 I
Seeking to counter criticism that he has not shown enough leadership in the nearly two-month-old crisis, Obama took a hard line with BP but did not go as far as reiterating an earlier assertion that he was looking for an "ass to kick." |