Those strawberry growers in Miller County who last year treated their
% G: F7 g x- t/ I6 P* pstrawberry fields with a certain fungicide report that this year strawberry
: d" c% O6 A- H7 s3 R+ |plants will not grow in the treated fields. Yet, since crop failures have
" _# i1 Q# M* A1 q6 J: }also occurred this year in adjacent, untreated fields, it is obvious that the
. A }0 z% g" F2 J2 W; Nfungicide is not responsible for this disaster.9 |5 V3 S' f' g& |
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?5 z/ Y6 V4 t3 o) s6 y, u( m$ ?; K# L6 J
Within weeks after spraying, the fungicide breaks down into a number , V% E' A" w' S6 }4 q2 |
of simple compounds that have no antifungal effect.
0 P6 N+ \2 D, D+ Y1 m; m* ?5 b6 z The fungicide is normally sprayed on fields only toward the end of the ( U0 q8 d8 w" A
growing season after the strawberries have begun to ripen. 0 m; Y% _- t M. B: Q
Farmers in Miller County who last year used a fungicide chemically/ Y. p7 \5 Q. q6 V- R
similar to that used on the affected strawberry fields have reported
; x3 a9 d3 R8 q) z3 C+ H no significant crop losses this year. 9 J3 a0 S; j! m# w3 k5 N- A
The crop failures in the adjacent, untreated fields were as serious as
# q" K e% C2 Q# e, I2 q5 a& { those that occurred in the treated fields. ) M4 ], P/ r# ^! S; J0 M
After being sprayed on crops, the fungicide travels easily through8 [4 W3 \9 n0 i8 U. v1 R
irrigation systems from field to field.
3 S$ {9 z' {2 T- F0 E/ _答案E |