Historical inquiry is a rational discipline only because of common stan-
2 s* W- Y y# x( t/ x% A" Gdards by which competing historical theories can be judged. Some
$ c' B1 J+ O: U. s+ B- o- x, lhistorians claim that their theories are exempt from these standards,2 {: N, Q' G' R3 h2 H3 p8 _) F
since the theories can explain away any evidence that might be brought
. X# X" T* |/ s+ U1 [against them. No truly rational account, however, would be immune in# m0 k& e E% t7 n* g6 q
this way to rational refutation.
+ w+ c& x4 b/ o+ x! I, R+ T! z
4 J! e( D Q% e$ ^% F The passage is structured to lead to the conclusion that
7 U- K, ~: g+ D* z* Z$ Z A the existence of historical theories that cannot be refuted using the
- c1 D5 {$ Z0 u1 {$ {0 Y8 L) y normal standards of historical inquiry shows that historical inquiry. V. o* ?% k# b$ F5 b( \; w- a
is not rational / Z. c/ Q: h% e; C( a: E
B a historical theory that can account for any conceivable or actual con- ~" G1 u+ h, C4 q3 \
trary evidence is not a rational historical theory * `# N. U: U! _0 W5 S
C one can only be sure that a historical theory is rational once it has- f9 j8 X) |* }2 P2 S
been refuted
& P3 F/ j' {8 ]: y" a D the rationality of historical inquiry depends on certain kinds of histori-4 z( T3 S, ~! ~: F
cal theories never receiving serious consideration by historians
) m( j% j7 H- T3 @ d+ L, e all that has to be done in order to prove the irrationality of a historical+ \9 T) |0 p# e* q( `
E theory is to ignore the standards by which historical theories can be3 N9 G( I- q7 ^4 b8 Q9 p
judged
, \* R; m0 T1 h9 O- f答案B |