The Willett Museum, which has one truly great work of art in an otherwise + c) t! V4 |, v) U. z5 p
mediocre collection, can afford to remain open to the public only by selling
, R( f) l* F% p! Xthat work. A sale is no long-term solution, however. True, the museum
7 c( h3 A$ `9 ]/ Owould save the expense of insuring and guarding the work; but loss of 8 L9 a' e: `- ^
revenue from shrinking attendance would outweigh those savings, so the " V1 p+ h3 J% v. r6 @/ e6 r
museum’s financial situation would only worsen. . a; m2 H' o# B( X& R* Y9 w
& Z9 ~. N4 P$ z1 {+ M3 a/ W
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?
% ? @4 `$ N3 q) l) V ! j+ ?3 T' }2 P2 D8 x
A The museum’s director might extract a contractual promise from the
* S; X, I. n# f7 M, Z* K1 W1 ` buyer of the work to offer the work to the Willett first if it is ever to be
9 [" V6 z/ a/ h5 x6 Q, D/ E sold again.
' H7 O' }' v' L) k B The net receipts from the sale of the work are likely to be so large
" R1 D2 O$ u f+ _! h1 n that, when prudently invested, they would yield an income each year
$ m, [; G- A* A$ Q9 B7 k sufficient to cover the Willett’s projected operating deficit.
8 e) a2 _6 }2 {! b3 e) _, D5 _ C No likely buyer could be expected to allow the work to continue to be
0 A! r) M: I! r6 |$ _ exhibited at the Willett. 0 g. {7 f, Y0 D% ~; ]
D Since the Willett would be selling under time pressure, it might not be / H. t' ]0 ~6 u$ |
able to sell the work for as much as the work is thought to be worth.
' w8 o8 z/ s/ L E It is unlikely that, even if the local community found out that the work 5 |( z: v# ~- }" y. K( p
was to be sold, enough generous donations would be made to 4 b$ p8 m& E' c. {. ~0 O
radically alter the Willett’s current financial situation. ( @7 h) O4 Q. e+ L! A1 G8 X0 B
答案 B |