6. Some biologists argue that each specifically 9 F$ q7 r* A# J2 {+ u
human trait must have arisen gradually and ! m8 t( `$ r6 C& _) }
erratically, and that it is therefore difficult to
5 l% E$ A4 t3 eisolate definite----in the evolution of the species. 3 x! E8 ]! n0 g3 y6 z
(A) fluctuations 4 _6 N n/ Z' i
(B) generations
2 Z ?1 v. T8 X9 r1 P* C$ u (C) predispositions
7 r7 b$ [; N5 ] (D) milestones . _; m$ L: q# k* m
(E) manifestations 7 h% k4 Q0 X0 ~4 c& R! y
6 K7 w9 S4 X$ O* o* Q1 d$ |
7. Ultimately, the book’s credibility is strained; the
* Z6 B5 C. K4 _" g' r {# a# jslender, though far from -----, web of evidence , e2 i( e* H+ Y! a/ d# d
presented on one salient point is expected to
6 y6 K$ H. C3 y$ l* { Osupport a vast ---- of implications.
1 S; ], L- F( E2 `7 h( [ (A) unconvincing.. cacophony 6 J K' C3 r: }% I8 c5 M
(B) nonexistent.. superstructure
' b1 `7 {6 W8 q6 n (C) indispensable.. array
2 W% b m% U. J/ a, V (D) intricate.. network
! F& L5 l3 d( A7 T" \/ O& Y i (E) imposing.. compendium e9 R8 S. P) w, F( e
- t& n- o: s S, R/ N8 H. k
8. SKETCH: PAINGING:: : \0 t: ] b. K" O4 | O
(A) outline: essay
* A7 P- A4 E) S& B (B) apparatus: experiment
9 R% W+ [3 y' ]. u (C) set: play
7 e! X" z8 O$ }. g) @6 V (D) graph: report
7 G+ S8 O) z* r/ u) P (E) rebuttal: debate % ^) G: q7 A, b- x/ |% e
" [4 c# d" g# }* x$ N
9. GEAR: TOOTH::
0 y8 h# @+ _8 N' y6 ]# i8 H (A) hammer: anvil " }& v+ u! H& T: y1 r& [2 Z
(B) bolt: nut
6 d; Y$ {; `% E (C) sprocket: chain ! @- {! q4 ~+ c* [' Z3 D
(D) girder: rivet
8 T3 ~8 o' y- Y: _ (E) screw: thread ) h2 y) F: i* v8 Z# `' o4 a( v5 g
- b. L, {: B# n" T
10. EXECUTOR: WILL:: - s$ y8 `, i: r1 U
(A) soldier: order & i: v# v5 \* c# l2 `
(B) predecessor: desire
' x; g6 J1 O& o1 d8 l' ]# Q (C) benefactor: award
4 l; r# O, |+ L: ~! c/ | (D) inheritor: estate . o9 F( \: O) t$ l# a2 J, A
(E) author: testimonial / r7 {" }0 j3 M- e
6.D 7.B 8.A 9.E 10.A |